icon caret-left icon caret-right instagram pinterest linkedin facebook twitter goodreads question-circle facebook circle twitter circle linkedin circle instagram circle goodreads circle pinterest circle

Notes from a Crusty Seeker

The Truth about Edna Robinson and The Trouble with the Truth—on the 33rd Anniversary of Her Leaving Her Body

See more at Edna Robinson page

It was February 2013. I'd been freelance book editing since losing my magazine job—on a day christened "Bloody Wednesday" in NY publishing—just before Christmas in 2008. Freelancing is a feast or famine deal, and I'd had close to a month of famine when a voice in my head whispered, "It's time. Pull Mom's manuscript out of the closet."


In 1957, when I was six, my mother, Edna Robinson, had written a short story called "The Trouble with the Truth." After it was published in the 1959 edition of the New World Writing book series, selected as one of the "most exciting and original" stories of its time by editors who had previously introduced the work of Samuel Beckett and Jack Kerouac, Edna's intensity became impenetrable. I remember watching her burrowed in her study typing. Why was she so mad, I wondered.


She wasn't mad. As a writer, I now understand the intensity. She was working her story into a novel of the same title. And when that novel was optioned by Harper & Row . . . and then dropped simply because it was about a single father with two peculiar children in the 1920s and '30s and To Kill a Mockingbird had occupied that territory, I believe something in my mother died.


When I first read The Trouble with the Truth in the 1970s, I loved it. The writing was gorgeous but I thought it needed some work. I wanted to talk about it, but Edna wouldn't discuss it. However, now it was 2013, Edna was dead, she'd left her manuscripts to me, and I was an unemployed book editor.


I pulled the crushed brown box out of the bowels of my closet and I'd barely begun to read the still-gorgeous prose on the old typewritten pages, when I realized this was a complete waste of energy. I was going to work on it, so why not read as I typed? And as soon as I began to do that, I realized there was a more efficient way: read as I edited and typed. And as soon as I began to see the timeline and fact glitches and all the undeveloped emotional underpinnings of the story, I decided to read as I doctored, typed, and yelled at Edna.


And I swear I heard her laughing. This was our dynamic when we were screenwriting partners: I'd yell, she'd laugh, I'd fix the mess, she'd write gorgeous lyrical circles around my straight-forward prose stage directions, and I'd say, "Thank you."


As an editor, one virtually views a work from inside the author's head. So as I read the 1957–59 manuscript, I, who was now old enough to be my mother's mother at the time, was living through her 36–38-year-old mind. But there was way more.


As a book editor/doctor, I was completely involved in the mechanics of correcting the problems, but I was also my mother's daughter, experiencing a mind-blowing expansion of understanding and compassion. Although the book is fiction, there are autobiographical aspects. And it was through the undeveloped parts that I got to know my mother more intimately than I believed possible. Through Edna's often unacknowledged subtext and all the unresolved areas, through aspects that were seeded but ungerminated, I got to know what she was afraid to acknowledge to herself: shame, jealousy, and a most complicated embarrassment about the fact that she had faith. I fixed, I doctored, and, I like to believe, healed. And I felt good.


But I also was afraid. What if Edna was displeased? Yes, she's dead, but I've had many experiences of her presence; was it all right to change her words, reveal emotions that I believed she'd chosen to ignore—and who was I to make such a judgment? Of all my revisions, the most troubling to me was a significant change to the ending. Edna's conclusion about the finality of death seemed to contradict the profound truths that preceded it as well as the afterthoughts that followed; but would she approve of the revised conclusion: that death is not necessarily the end?


It wasn't until months after finishing the project that I realized that Edna not only condoned the change but had rewritten the ending with her own actions: Shortly after her death, a clear glass marble (we each carried one in our change purses to signify the other) dropped out of nowhere—it wasn't there and then it was—turning my life upside down and decimating any embarrassment I might have held from my agnostic/atheist upbringing about believing there is more existence than we can see or comprehend.


I'm glad that my editor's head prevailed. The book is multi-leveled, fully alive, and best of all, published. I trust Edna Robinson is enjoying it.


* * *


The Trouble with the Truth was published by Simon & Schuster/Atria/Infinite Words in February 2015. You can read the complete story of the appearance of the marble and see a photo of Betsy and Edna Robinson here.

Post a comment