Betsy Robinson, author of funny literary stories about flawed people, is a perpetual seeker of truth.

From books to music to theater and fine art, from online TV to DVDs, this blog takes a look at current culture through a spiritual perspective — with a touch of humor.

Materials under the "review" tag are a mix of free review copies (books, DVDs, etc.) in exchange for a review, to library copies, to materials and tickets I've paid for.

A Really Bad Hair Day (Feb. 13 blog)

The Art of Collapsing (Feb. 6 blog)

Life is only temporary says Evan Handler (Jan. 28 blog)

The New World of Finance (Jan. 28 blog)

All about growing up in a cult (April 16 blog)

Fierce Giving (Jan. 8 blog)











(Copyright © 2008-2014 Betsy Robinson. All rights reserved)

Notes from a Crusty Seeker

How to Know What You’re Really Doing: Collusion, Confrontation, or Compassion? Peacemaking or Placating?

July 1, 2010

Tags: compassionate wisdom, healing, review

Recently I’ve been experiencing a dilemma about how to react in many areas of my life, which tells me I should pay attention.

When someone takes what is not theirs — from a person, a people, or the planet; when someone denies a truth; when one person hurts another person, people, or the planet, what is the right response . . . or lack thereof?

In politics, we become human clumps who are certain of our point of view, and therefore our response: “They’re wrong! They must be stopped!” we scream. “They must acknowledge guilt, make amends, and take the punishment!” We rally others to sign petitions, we forward emails, and post links on Facebook, certain that “good people” everywhere should support our cause.

But “they” is a bunch of “he” and “she” s. And “he” and “she” are a bunch of “I”s. Why is it so unclear how or when to confront when we are dealing with ourselves or, even worse, another “I”?

“She” rails against the Wall Street crooks, but then feels entitled to cheat on her taxes and joke about it to her friends. Should they collude with a laugh, or confront, or judge that the “she” is not open to confrontation, and therefore silence is most compassionate?

I don’t know the answers. I’m just asking.

We elect a leader who is a peacemaker, and then rail at him for not acting like an irate psychopath when an injustice is done.

“He” claims that he values authenticity and honesty, but then he lies and manipulates to win. “She” feels entitled to steal because she has been deprived or she thinks nobody will notice.

Embarrassed to confront because we will look petty, or we will be a pest, or they won’t like us, we stay silent. “They won’t agree,” we tell ourselves, “or maybe I’m wrong. After all, it is just my opinion. Therefore it’s not worth saying anything, and it is better to be a peacemaker in a situation where speaking will, at best, make everybody (including me) uncomfortable, and, at worst, blow everything apart.”

I think, for me, decisions to speak or remain silent become a matter of priorities: What is more important here — being liked or confronting something? Will a greater good be served by speaking? What is at stake — either by saying nothing or by rocking the boat? Can compassion be served by a charged response — shocking someone out of a behavior by humiliating them?

I’ve seen spiritual teachers shake people and humiliate them “for their greater good” or ignore them for the same reason. The newest neuroscience, in fact, proves that a certain amount of shock is critical to making a lasting change. (See Radical Change article.) What if people don’t want to change? Can we accept that? If not, is our impulse to respond really about being an agent for the greater good?

In her extraordinarily simple and moving The Holy Man book series, author Susan Trott tells the story of a regular guy named Joe who becomes known as a holy man. People from far and wide make a pilgrimage to stand on line up a mountain to have an audience with him. They are so hungry “to get something” that when finally they make it to the front of the line and are greeted at the door by a humble servant, they demand the presence of the holy man posthaste. The servant bows, and rushes them through the house and out the back door. “But I have come to see the holy man!” they protest.

“You have seen me,” says the servant.

Most of the people are nice about being fooled. Some are not. But fooling them — maybe even embarrassing them — serves the greatest good. Those who are too embedded in their ire to realize what he’s saying will remain angry, so nothing is changed. But those who hear and are embarrassed may learn from the humiliation to recognize every person as a holy man. And maybe those people will then become wiser clumps of “I”s . . .

Or maybe not. I have no answers. I’m just pondering . . . What do you think?

Comments

  1. July 5, 2010 1:52 AM EDT

    Maybe your in the dilemma of tiring to understand people in general. a high percentage of people that you meet will have he or she's in there sentience and are talking about them self so theirs your I's. you sound like a person with a good heart a pure soul that thinks deep about a persons actions they cause by there own selfishness.in most cases the suffering that we feel usually comes from the suffering of our own doing and this suffering is a pain that we inflict to help our self-growth. i was told once all people are like children when you touch a flame and burn yourself then we tend not to touch that flame again, as adults we do the same but instead of fire its with our emotions. in your deepest thoughts of suffering don't ever forget all the wonders of this world in every religion i have ever studied theirs always a cretin law wither it's you reap what you sew or karma your he's and she's and I's always project and come back as ether love kindness and forgiveness or it can come back as hate anger and retreats. action growth and time are our fertilizers in life. there's something i always have to remind myself, don't think about life so much you forget to live.
    - betsy landers

Selected Works

novel
Big Moose Prize-winning novel
a funny, sometimes sad, story of negotiating life without a clue

New on Kindle--a funny book for foodies who are committed to self-change through self-awareness
an epistolary memoir ... sort of
A funny and moving little book for anyone who's had a mother or struggled with being human.
anthology of stories and plays
includes Darleen Dances and stories below

play
1-act play

short story
the problem with worrying about the future

true story
Why I don't believe in death.

Editing Services

Quick Links